Heritage Financial and its Founder & Chairman, Chuck Bean, have regularly appeared on top wealth management lists compiled by Barron’s, Forbes, The Financial Times, and Financial Advisor Magazine, and have also received the distinguished honors of being named a Barron’s Hall of Fame Advisor (2019) and a recipient of the Charles Schwab Best in Business Impact Award (2017). Details on each recognition are below.
Heritage does not provide or receive any compensation to or from any person, firm or media in exchange for placement on a ranking. Heritage paid for the right to use Barron's and Forbes logos and to access premium website features.
BARRON'S HALL OF FAME ADVISOR
Inducted September 2019 based on data from 2008, 2011-2019.
Awarded to Charles Bean, Heritage Financial’s Founder and Chairman September 2019 based on data from 2008, 2011-2019. Each member of the Barron’s Hall of Fame has appeared in 10 or more of one of three Barron’s annual Top 100 Advisor rankings, (Barron’s Top 100 Advisors, Barron’s Top 100 Women Advisors, Barron’s Top 100 Independent Advisors).
Advisors appearing in rankings have answered 100-plus questions about their practices in Barron's annual survey. The questionnaire addresses a wide range of data points, including the assets the advisors oversee, the revenue they collect on those assets, the industry designations they possess, their regulatory records, the length of time they’ve been in the industry, their charitable and philanthropic work, the investment vehicles they use to allocate assets, the sizes and shapes of their teams, and more.
TOP 100 INDEPENDENT FINANCIAL ADVISORS/ TOP 1500 FINANCIAL ADVISORS/ TOP 1200 FINANCIAL ADVISORS
“Top 100 Independent Financial Advisors" 2008, 2011-2025. Awarded each September (2008, 2011-2025) by Barron's based on data within a 12-month period ending December 31 each year.
“Top 1500 Financial Advisors” (formerly, Top 1200 Financial Advisors). Awarded March 2026 by Barron's based on data within a 12-month period ending September 30, 2025.
“Top 1200 Financial Advisors” 2009, 2014-2025. Awarded each March (2009, 2014-2025) by Barron's based on data within a 12-month period ending September 30 each year.
Barron's Methodology for Ranking Advisors
BARRON'S TOP 100 INDEPENDENT WEALTH ADVISORS
Awarded to Charles Bean, Heritage Financial’s Founder and Chairman. According to Barron’s, Advisors who wish to be ranked fill out a 102-question survey about their practice. Barron's verifies that data with the advisors’ firms and with regulatory databases and then they apply a rankings formula to the data to generate a ranking. The formula features three major categories of calculations: (1) Assets (2) Revenue (3) Quality of practice. There are multiple factors and calculations in each of these categories.
BARRON'S TOP 1500 WEALTH ADVISORS
Formerly Barron's Top 1200 Wealth Advisors. This ranking was awarded March 2026 by Barron's based on data within a 12-month period ending September 30, 2025. The rankings are based on data provided by over 7,000 of the nation's most productive advisors. Factors included in the rankings: assets under management, revenue produced for the firm, regulatory record, quality of practice, and philanthropic work. Investment performance isn't an explicit component because not all advisors have audited results and because performance figures often are influenced more by clients' risk tolerance than by an advisor's investment-picking abilities. No compensation was paid to be included in this ranking; however, compensation has been paid for the right to use Barron's logo and to access premium website features.
BARRON'S TOP 1200 WEALTH ADVISORS
Awarded to Charles Bean, Heritage Financial’s Founder and Chairman. According to Barron’s, rankings are based on data provided by over 5,000 of the nation’s most productive advisors in each of the 50 states, plus the District of Columbia, with the number of spots determined by each state’s population and wealth. The rankings are based on assets under management, revenues generated by advisors for their firms, quality of the advisors’ practice, and philanthropic work. In evaluating advisors, Barron’s examines regulatory records, internal company documents, and 100-plus points of data provided by the advisors themselves.
Top 100 RIA FIRMS/ BEST IN STATE/ AMERICAS TOP 250 WEALTH ADVISORS
“America's Top RIA Firms”2022-2025. Awarded each October (2022-2025). Data compiled by SHOOK Research LLC based on data within a 12-month period ending March 31 each year.
“Best in State Wealth Advisors”2019-2026. Awarded each April (2019-2026). Data compiled by SHOOK Research LLC based on data within a 12-month period ending June 30 each year.
“Americas Top 250 Wealth Advisors” 2017-2021. Awarded each August (2017-2021). Data compiled by SHOOK Research LLC based on data within a 12-month period.
AMERICA'S TOP 100 RIA FIRMS
Basic Requirements
- Minimum of 7 years as an advisor for 1 partner/principal
- Fully operational as a practice for a minimum of 1 year
- Must incorporate a fiduciary model
- Completion of online survey
- Evaluations focused on wealth management
- Acceptable compliance record
Quantitative Metrics
- Revenues
- Assets under management—and quality of those assets
- Client-related data, such as retention rates
- Portfolio performance is not a factor; audited returns among advisors are rare, and differing client objectives provide varying returns
Qualitative Metrics
- Telephone, virtual and in-person meetings with firms (if an in-person meeting cannot be accomplished, exceptions are considered in which the interview will occur after a ranking has been published).
- Compliance records. Some “dings” can be overlooked (e.g., firm or product failure beyond the scope of an advisor's due diligence; the older a ding, the less we look). Since there are many gray areas, the SHOOK team is willing to listen to a firm that is willing to stand behind the advisor with written support.
- Firms that provide a full client experience: Service model; investing process; fee structure; breadth of services (e.g., liabilities and other wealth management services)
- Credentials (years of service can serve as proxy)
- Use of team and team dynamics
- Community involvement
- Discussions with management, peers, competing peers
U4/Compliance Issues
The following conditions will be considered in order to lessen weightings infractions:
- Infractions that are denied or closed with no action
- Complaint arose from a product, service or advice initiated by a previous advisor or another member or former member of team
- Length of time since complaint
- Complaints related to product failure not related to investment advice (some limited partnerships, adjusted-rate securities, etc.)
- Complaints that have been settled (must be proven) to appease a client who remained with the advisor for at least one year following settlement date
- Complaints that are proven to be meritless
- Actions taken as a result of administrative error or failure by firm
Once an advisor's compliance rating falls into a tenable category, the following conditions must be met:
- An advisor's rating must be among SHOOK's highest qualitative measures including in-person interview
- Letters of recommendation
SHOOK is completely independent and objective and does not receive compensation from the advisors, firms, the media, or any other source in exchange for placement on a ranking.
FORBES BEST IN STATE WEALTH ADVISORS
Awarded to Charles Bean, Heritage Financial’s Founder and Chairman. According to Forbes, those advisors that are considered have a minimum of seven years’ experience, and the algorithm weights factors like revenue trends, assets under management, compliance records, industry experience and those that encompass best practices and their approach to working with clients. SHOOK is completely independent and objective and does not receive compensation from the advisors, firms, the media, or any other source in exchange for placement on a ranking.
Basic Requirements
- 7 years as an advisor.
- Minimum 1 year at current firm, with exceptions such as acquisitions, etc.
- Advisor must be recommended, and nominated, by their firm.
- Completion of online survey.
- Business that is conducted with individuals is evaluated.
- Acceptable compliance record.
Quantitative
- Weightings assigned for both revenue and production data
- Assets under management—and quality of those assets—both custodied and a scrutinized look at assets held away (Although individual numbers are used for ranking purposes, we publish the entire team’s assets.)
- Client-related data, such as retention.
- Portfolio performance is not a factor; audited returns among advisors are rare, and differing client objectives provide varying returns.
Qualitative
- Telephone, virtual, and in-person meetings with advisors (telephone interviews are required; if an in-person meeting cannot be accomplished, exceptions are considered in which the interview will occur after a ranking has been published)
- Advisors that exhibit “best practices” within their practices and approach to working with clients.
- Compliance records & U4s. Some “dings” can be overlooked (e.g., firm or product failure beyond the scope of an advisor’s due diligence; the older a ding, the less we look). Since there are many gray areas, the SHOOK team is willing to listen to a Firm that is willing to stand behind the advisor with written support from leadership.
- SHOOK measures client “impact,” a proprietary indicator that measures the difference advisors make in the lives of their clients.
- Advisors that provide a full client experience:
- Service model
- Investing process
- Fee structure (higher % of fee-based assets earns more points)
- Breadth of services, including extensive use of Firm’s platform and resources (e.g., liabilities)
- Credentials (years of service can serve as proxy).
- Use of team & team dynamics
- Community involvement
- Discussions with management, peers, competing peers
- Telephone and in-person meetings
U4/Compliance Issues
The following conditions will be considered in order to lessen weightings infractions:
- Infractions that are denied or closed with no action.
- Complaint arose from a product, service or advice initiated by a previous advisor or another member or former member of team.
- Length of time since complaint.
- Complaints related to product failure not related to investment advice (some limited partnerships, adjusted-rate securities, etc.).
- Complaints that have been settled (must be proven) to appease a client who remained with the advisor for at least one year following settlement date.
- Complaints that are proven to be meritless.
- Actions taken as a result of administrative error or failure by firm.
Once an advisor’s compliance rating falls into a tenable category, the following conditions must be met.
- An advisor’s rating must be among SHOOK’s highest qualitative measures including in-person interview.
- Letters of recommendation from firm.
SHOOK is completely independent and objective and does not receive compensation from the advisors, firms, the media, or any other source in exchange for placement on a ranking.
FORBES LIST OF AMERICA'S TOP WEALTH ADVISORS
Awarded to Charles Bean, Heritage Financial’s Founder and Chairman. The ranking, developed by Forbes’ partner SHOOK Research, is based on in-person and telephone due-diligence meetings and a ranking algorithm for advisors who have a minimum of seven years of experience. Client retention, industry experience, compliance records and firm nominations as well as quantitative criteria such as assets under management and revenue generated have been considered for the ranking.
Basic Requirements
- 7 years as an advisor.
- Minimum 1 year at current firm, with exceptions such as acquisitions, etc.
- Advisor must be recommended, and nominated, by their firm.
- Completion of online survey.
- Business that is conducted with individuals is evaluated.
- Acceptable compliance record.
Quantitative
- Weightings assigned for both revenue and production data
- Assets under management—and quality of those assets—both custodied and a scrutinized look at assets held away (Although individual numbers are used for ranking purposes, we publish the entire team’s assets.)
- Client-related data, such as retention.
- Portfolio performance is not a factor; audited returns among advisors are rare, and differing client objectives provide varying returns.
Qualitative
- Telephone, virtual, and in-person meetings with advisors (telephone interviews are required; if an in-person meeting cannot be accomplished, exceptions are considered in which the interview will occur after a ranking has been published)
- Advisors that exhibit “best practices” within their practices and approach to working with clients.
- Compliance records & U4s. Some “dings” can be overlooked (e.g., firm or product failure beyond the scope of an advisor’s due diligence; the older a ding, the less we look). Since there are many gray areas, the SHOOK team is willing to listen to a Firm that is willing to stand behind the advisor with written support from leadership.
- SHOOK measures client “impact,” a proprietary indicator that measures the difference advisors make in the lives of their clients.
- Advisors that provide a full client experience:
- Service model
- Investing process
- Fee structure (higher % of fee-based assets earns more points)
- Breadth of services, including extensive use of Firm’s platform and resources (e.g., liabilities)
- Credentials (years of service can serve as proxy).
- Use of team & team dynamics
- Community involvement
- Discussions with management, peers, competing peers
- Telephone and in-person meetings
U4/Compliance Issues
The following conditions will be considered in order to lessen weightings infractions:
- Infractions that are denied or closed with no action.
- Complaint arose from a product, service or advice initiated by a previous advisor or another member or former member of team.
- Length of time since complaint.
- Complaints related to product failure not related to investment advice (some limited partnerships, adjusted-rate securities, etc.).
- Complaints that have been settled (must be proven) to appease a client who remained with the advisor for at least one year following settlement date.
- Complaints that are proven to be meritless.
- Actions taken as a result of administrative error or failure by firm.
Once an advisor’s compliance rating falls into a tenable category, the following conditions must be met.
- An advisor’s rating must be among SHOOK’s highest qualitative measures including in-person interview.
- Letters of recommendation from firm.
SHOOK is completely independent and objective and does not receive compensation from the advisors, firms, the media, or any other source in exchange for placement on a ranking.
TOP REGISTERED INVESTMENT ADVISORS
“America's Top Registered Investment Advisor” for 16 consecutive years, 2009-2025. Awarded each July/August issue 2009-2025 by Financial Advisor Magazine, based on data within a 12-month period.
This is an annual ranking that uses advisor assets under management (AUM), percentage growth in AUM, average assets per client, percentage growth in assets per client, and percentage change in number of clients as the criteria to find the top RIAs in the country.
5-Star REGISTERED INVESTMENT ADVISORS
Awarded by InvestmentNews September 2025 based on data as of December 31, 2024.
Firms are selected based on objective criteria including assets under management (AUM), AUM growth, and the number of new clients acquired organically over the past 12 months. All submitted data undergoes a rigorous verification process.
To qualify for inclusion, firms must manage a minimum of $1 billion in AUM in 2024. This recognition highlights best-in-class Registered Investment Advisors across the country who demonstrate consistent growth, strong client engagement, and overall excellence in wealth management.
CNBC Financial Advisor 100
Awarded by CNBC October 2025. Data compiled by CNBC and AccuPoint Data Solutions as of June 30, 2025.
CNBC’s Financial Advisor 100 list is determined through a blend of data analysis and editorial review.
As an initial screening, data provider AccuPoint Solutions analyzes core data points from its proprietary database of registered investment advisors, or RIAs, as well as the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission’s regulatory database. Firms that don’t meet CNBC’s proprietary criteria are removed from the list.
CNBC sends an extensive email survey to all those firms that meet the initial criteria to gather more details about their practice. CNBC applies a layer of editorial review, clarifying firm entries as needed and verifying responses against the SEC regulatory database and other publicly available resources.
AccuPoint Solutions then applies CNBC’s proprietary weighted criteria to refine the list and rank the firms. These data points include:
- Advisory firm’s regulatory/compliance record
- Number of years in the business
- Number of certified financial planners
- Number of employees
- Number of investment advisors registered with the firm
- Ratio of investment advisors to the total number of employees
- Total assets under management
- Percentage of discretionary assets under management
- Total accounts under management
- Number of states where the RIA is registered
- Country of domicile
https://www.cnbc.com/2025/10/01/financial-advisor-100-methodology-2025.html
BEST-IN-BUSINESS IMPACT AWARD
“Best-in-Business IMPACT Award” winner 2017
INVESTOPEDIA TOP 100 FINANCIAL ADVISORS
Awarded July 11, 2023 for the year 2023.
See the full Investopedia 100 recipient list and award methodology here.
The annual Investopedia 100 list honors independent U.S.-based financial advisors who have demonstrated top-of-the-industry skills in the following critical areas:
- Reach: defined as the domain authority of their personal blog or website, followers across socials (LinkedIn, X, TikTok, Instagram, and YouTube), and podcasts (including appearances or ownership of a personal podcast).
- Commitment to financial literacy: measured by the advisor’s participation in workshops, programs, nonprofits or collaboration with others in the community to spread financial education to those who need it most, as well as the creation of accessible content.
- Community support: measured through peer nominations by industry professionals outside of their own firms, as well as the advisor’s presence and engagement with others in the financial planning industry.
Each advisor CRD number was checked for validity, and each application was checked for accuracy and quality. Final scores were tabulated according to weights designated for each of the criteria above. Investopedia receives no compensation from placing advisors on our list, nor does an advisor's appearance on our list constitute an individual endorsement by Investopedia of such advisor.
TOP 300 REGISTERED INVESTMENT ADVISORS
2018 - Awarded June 2018 based on data gathered for the year ending December 31, 2017.
2019 - Awarded June 2019 based on data gathered for the year ending December 31, 2018.
According to Financial Times, this list is based on six broad factors, including advisor’s assets under management (AUM), asset growth, the company’s age, industry certifications of key employees, SEC compliance record and online accessibility. Financial Times ended this award ranking in 2021.